six posts without replies to tags. the last one i replied to was jon's which is currently third on my tagboard. ahh well.
weienyeah, here's a very late thank you. and a recent thank you too, in appreciation of how you were there for me even though i pretty much snapped at everybody on friday.
sebasone day, ONE DAY, i'll teach you h2 chem.
yuhuiyou clicked huh. there was a disclaimer there for a reason. haha.
jiabinwhoah. i did leave a pretty huge impact huh.
xingyingit's always more comfortable to do on a familiar topic. but i don't think i'll stick to it till a's.
meganthis blog's purple because the blogger likes purple. i think the b & w pictures are to dissolve the gross factor. did you manage to get police tape when you went to the npc?
weienonly when your words are worth quoting then i quote one okay!
jiabinsometimes, yeah. but i guess it's part and parcel of growing up. but even when working you'll feel like you're being treated as a slave by your boss right. moral of the story, study hard, work hard and be a boss. and treat people like slaves. haha.
anon<3 back. i think you should leave your name the next time.
bessyi go bloghopping very often, since most of the time i don't do my homework. so don't feel guilty that you're not reading my blog, it prolly means that you've been doing homework. i voted for your blog! thanks (:
joyahh. hello.
blogger should merge with hotmail. not google. then i can sign in to both at the same time.
there's been many newspaper articles recently about incentives to be given for working women giving birth. both from the reporter's point of view, which equates to the government's perspective (somewhat) and also from readers.
but firstly, why not let us think,
what is the reason for coming up with incentives to encourage birth?ultimately, it's to hope that women
give up their careers for the family. because the government knows fully, that women juggling work and family are not really sought after. because they are seen as
less productive then other women who don't have to tackle kids.
bearing children, was, a
sign of love between a couple. yet now, benefits have to be given for children to be brought to this earth. is it the fault of our people? i'd say no, it's the fault of the society. how we are
distorted to think that males are the dominating sex.
if females taking maternity leave, childcare leave, and medical leave are considered non-productive hence dismissable, what about males having to go for
ns and reservice? aren't we both contributing to the country while being away from work? for females, it's for social defence. for males, it's military defence. does that make women inferior?
i understand that women may cause some trouble when they take leaves, especially the long maternity leave, but that doesn't give them the disadvantage of losing their job. after all, it is not worth it for a person to lose his/her job of circa three
decades just because of an absence of three
months.
i should think that bosses who decide that mother-to-be women are to be done without are those without families
themselves. otherwise, i'm sure they'll be able to put themselves in their employees shoes.
so shouldn't the government, or anybody in charge for this matter, make it a rule that all
managerial staff should have a family to maintain? by family, i do not mean the mum-dad family, but the husband-wife-childrem family. this would ensure that the welfare of lower-ranking but definitely more important staff is not compromised.
or, if incentives must be involved, since somehow the society loves this word alot, give them partly to employers as well, to encourage them to
reserve positions for women undergoing maternity leave, or to encourage them to hire mothers.
hiring mums should be pretty good, since mums are proven (by yours truly) to be more committed to their jobs and more patient to demands. and therefore they are more productive and thus can meet the aim of the firm, which is assumed by economists to be
profit maximisation.if i were to be a mum, while i'm working of course, i'd seriously consider the incentives givento me, in case my boss decides to fire me. unless of course,
i'm my own boss. but then, i'd have to consider my oppotunity costs for choosing to give birth. you know, benefits of the next best alternative forgone. imagine if i were my own boss, that'll be prolly of a rather money-making firm, how much i can earn in three months. that will all go to nothing if i take maternity leave and not have incentives. i may suffer from
subnormal profits some more, since if i ever become a plastic surgeon, i'd expect my fixed cost to be of a substantial amount.
so if nobody gives me stuff i feel is worth my three months' pay plus all the torture i need through for nine months and the whatever pain i need to succumb to during childbirth and the changing of figure and everything, no, i won't even think of contributing to singapore's population. incentives, i think, are
rewards to mums. they totally deserve it, and most likely should be given more.
i shall stop here, this is sounding like a gp/econs essay.